In re Village at Camp Bowie I, L.P.

710 F.3d 239 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Village at Camp Bowie I, L.P.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
710 F.3d 239 (2013)

Facts

Village at Camp Bowie I, LLC (Village) (debtor) obtained financing for its real estate venture by executing promissory notes that came to be held by Western Real Estate Equities, LLC (Western) (creditor). Village defaulted on the notes and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Village owed roughly $32 million on the notes and roughly $59,000 total to 38 unsecured creditors. Village proposed a reorganization plan with two impaired creditor classes: one for Western’s secured claim and one for all unsecured claims. Village’s plan proposed giving Western a new five-year note in the amount of its claim plus interest. The plan proposed paying the unsecured claimholders in full within three months of the plan’s effective date, without interest. The unsecured-creditors class voted to accept the plan, but Western voted to reject. Western argued that the plan could not be confirmed because Village had artificially impaired the unsecured-creditors class by proposing to pay the creditors after confirmation and without interest—even though Village had the money to pay the creditors in full at confirmation—so that Village could satisfy 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(10)’s plan-confirmation requirement that at least one impaired class vote to accept the plan. Western argued that because the class was artificially impaired, the class’s vote did not count for purposes of § 1129(a)(10). Western also argued that Village’s artificial impairment was an abuse of the bankruptcy process in violation of § 1129(a)(3)’s plan-confirmation requirement that a debtor’s plan be proposed in good faith. The bankruptcy court noted that artificially impairing a class was not per se bad faith and found that Village had satisfied § 1129(a)(3) because Village had proposed a feasible plan for legitimate bankruptcy purposes. The court confirmed Village’s plan, and Western appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership