In the Matter of Baby M.

525 A.2d 1128 (1987)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Baby M.

New Jersey Superior Court
525 A.2d 1128 (1987)

RW

Facts

William Stern and his wife, Elizabeth (plaintiffs), were a well-educated professional couple. Mary Beth Whitehead (defendant) was a financially needy and poorly educated woman. Mr. Stern and Whitehead entered into a surrogate-parenthood contract whereby, in return for Mr. Stern’s payment of $10,000 and his supply of his sperm, Whitehead would use the sperm to fertilize her egg, become pregnant, carry the fetus to term, and then surrender the child to Mr. Stern and renounce her parental rights. Whitehead became pregnant and gave birth to Baby M. Following Baby M.’s birth, Whitehead changed her mind and refused to part with the infant. The Sterns sued to enforce the contract. When court papers were served on Whitehead, she took Baby M. and fled to Florida, where state officials took custody of Baby M pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act. Trial subsequently commenced in New Jersey Superior Court, where Whitehead contended that the contract was both invalid, being contrary to public policy, and also illusory, there being no mutuality of obligation between the parties.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sorkow, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership