In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Brey

490 N.W.2d 15 (1992)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Brey

Wisconsin Supreme Court
490 N.W.2d 15 (1992)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Allen Brey (defendant) was admitted to the practice of law and served as the district attorney for a Wisconsin county. A defendant charged with multiple offenses was in jail for several months awaiting trial. Brey knew that the defendant was represented by counsel. Brey had the defendant taken from his cell to the jail library, expressed his opinion of how the defendant’s attorney was handling the case, and made settlement offers. The defendant told his attorney about the meeting, and the attorney moved for an order barring Brey from prosecuting the case. In an application to the court for appointment of a special prosecutor, Brey denied that he had met with the defendant. The defendant’s attorney filed a grievance with the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (board) (plaintiff). Brey repeatedly denied having had contact with the defendant. At the meeting of the professional-responsibility committee investigating the matter, Brey finally admitted that he had met with the defendant. The referee recommended that Brey’s misconduct be sanctioned by a public reprimand. The board sought a 60-day suspension of Brey’s license to practice law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership