From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
In the Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena of Ford v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
756 F.2d 249 (1985)
Colette Pean was indicted in federal court for conspiracy. Pean’s husband, Ford (defendant) was subpoenaed to give testimony to the grand jury. Ford filed a motion to quash the subpoena, asserting the privilege against adverse spousal testimony. The government (plaintiff) responded with an affidavit promising not to use Ford’s testimony against Pean. Specifically, the government asserted it would establish an ethical wall pursuant to which Ford would be questioned by an assistant United States attorney (AUSA) who was not working on the Pean indictment, in front of a grand jury different from the one conducting the Pean indictment. The government also promised that if Ford’s testimony was useful to the government, Pean’s trial would be severed from the other alleged coconspirators and the testimony would not be used in her separate trial. This trial would be conducted by an AUSA and jury not familiar with the overarching indictment. The district court found that these procedures upheld the principles of the spousal privilege and denied Ford’s motion. After Ford refused to testify, he was held in contempt. Ford appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Timbers, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.