Inkel v. Livingston

869 A.2d 745 (2005)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Inkel v. Livingston

Maine Supreme Judicial Court
869 A.2d 745 (2005)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Donald Livingston hired Solid Rock Builders (collectively, defendants) to build a new house some 42 feet away from his existing oceanfront cottage. During construction, Livingston invited Leonard Inkel (plaintiff) and his family to Easter dinner at the cottage. Inkel had visited several times before and had salvaged windows and doors at the construction site. After dinner, Inkel went outside to smoke, with his son. The two walked to the construction site in the rain as dusk approached. No lights were on and only some walls erected. Ten to 20 feet inside, Inkel fell into an uncovered chimney hole. In the ensuing lawsuit, Inkel claimed Livingston owed him a duty of care as an invitee. The trial court found that the scope of Inkel’s invitation extended only to the cottage and granted summary judgment. Inkel appealed, arguing he had an implied invitation to enter the construction site.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Levy, J.)

Dissent (Calkins, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership