Inkel v. Livingston
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
869 A.2d 745 (2005)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Donald Livingston hired Solid Rock Builders (collectively, defendants) to build a new house some 42 feet away from his existing oceanfront cottage. During construction, Livingston invited Leonard Inkel (plaintiff) and his family to Easter dinner at the cottage. Inkel had visited several times before and had salvaged windows and doors at the construction site. After dinner, Inkel went outside to smoke, with his son. The two walked to the construction site in the rain as dusk approached. No lights were on and only some walls erected. Ten to 20 feet inside, Inkel fell into an uncovered chimney hole. In the ensuing lawsuit, Inkel claimed Livingston owed him a duty of care as an invitee. The trial court found that the scope of Inkel’s invitation extended only to the cottage and granted summary judgment. Inkel appealed, arguing he had an implied invitation to enter the construction site.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Levy, J.)
Dissent (Calkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.