Intel Corporation v. Hamidi
California Supreme Court
71 P.3d 296 (2003)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Intel Corporation (plaintiff) maintained an email system for its employees. Intel permitted “reasonable non-business use” of the system. On six occasions over two years, Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi (defendant), a former Intel employee, sent mass email communications to up to 35,000 of Intel’s current employees at a time. These communications were critical of Intel’s employment practices. Hamidi provided employees the opportunity to opt out of receiving his emails if they wished. Employees receiving the emails discussed the content of the messages between themselves and their managers. The emails caused no other disruption to Intel and its computers. On several occasions, Intel asked Hamidi to cease using its equipment to transport messages. Intel brought suit against Hamidi alleging trespass to chattels. The trial court granted Intel’s motion for summary judgment and issued an injunction preventing Hamidi from sending emails to Intel employees through Intel’s email system. The court of appeals affirmed, and Hamidi appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)
Concurrence (Kennard, J.)
Dissent (Mosk, J.)
Dissent (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 827,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 992 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
