International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Daniel
United States Supreme Court
439 U.S. 551 (1979)
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (Teamsters) (defendant) negotiated a collective bargaining agreement with several employers, in which said employers would pay into a pension fund for their respective employees. Employees were then entered into a compulsory pension fund, which the employers paid into each week. After twenty years of continuous service, employees were eligible for payouts from their pension. Daniel (plaintiff) was an employee for one of the employers that had negotiated with the Teamsters regarding this arrangement. After a dispute as to whether his employment was continuous for twenty years, Daniel brought suit against the Teamsters for failing to inform him of all the material facts regarding the plan, in violation of Securities Act of 1933. The district court ruled in favor of Daniel. The Teamsters appealed, with the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirming. The Teamsters then petitioned for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.