Johan Deckmyn v. Helena Vandersteen

Case C-201/13 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johan Deckmyn v. Helena Vandersteen

European Union Court of Justice
Case C-201/13 (2014)

Facts

Johan Deckmyn (defendant) was a member of the right-wing Vlaams Belang party, which was supported by the nonprofit Vrijheidsfonds VZW (defendant). At a New Year’s reception in the Belgian city of Ghent, Deckmyn and the Vrijheidsfonds handed out calendars that contained a drawing inspired by a 1961 Spike and Suzy comic by Willy Vandersteen. The comic depicted a character in a white tunic throwing coins to people. The calendar changed the character to the mayor of Ghent and depicted the coin recipients as people wearing veils and people of color. Helena Vandersteen and other heirs of Willy Vandersteen (the Vandersteen heirs) (plaintiffs) brought a copyright-infringement action against Deckmyn and the Vrijheidsfonds, who responded by citing parody as a defense under Belgian law. The Vandersteen heirs argued that parody was required to (1) serve a critical purpose, (2) display an originality of its own, (3) display humor, (4) attempt to mock the original work, and (5) borrow no more from the original work than necessary. The Belgian court referred the matter to the European Union Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership