John R. v. Oakland Unified School District

769 P.2d 948 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

John R. v. Oakland Unified School District

California Supreme Court
769 P.2d 948 (1989)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

John R.’s ninth-grade math teacher encouraged him to participate in an extracurricular work-experience program sanctioned by his school that involved correcting other students’ papers at the teacher’s apartment. The teacher developed a close relationship with John after many sessions and pressured him into engaging in sexual acts. John’s parents (plaintiffs) sued the Oakland Unified School District (defendant), asserting it held vicarious liability for the teacher’s acts and direct liability for its own negligence. The trial court sustained a demurrer dismissing the claims based on vicarious liability. The appellate court reversed, reasoning that the official authority that the school conferred on John’s teacher made the misconduct possible, even though it exceeded the scope of his official duties. The state supreme court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Arguelles, J.)

Concurrence

Concurrence

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership