Johnson v. Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
437 F.3d 1112 (2006)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
After buying a compact disk at Barnes & Noble, (defendant) Winston Johnson (plaintiff) asked a store clerk for help finding a book. When the clerk bent over to pull a book from a low shelf, Johnson touched the clerk or her shirt. Johnson claimed he was only trying to help the clerk tuck in her shirt (which she was trying to reach). The clerk claimed Johnson grabbed her buttocks. The clerk fetched two store managers and a security guard, who detained Johnson in an office for one to two hours until police arrived. Meanwhile, Johnson was interrogated, photographed, and subjected to racial remarks. The police questioned Johnson, then returned his ID and driver’s license and told him to leave. Johnson sued the bookstore for false imprisonment. He testified that he suffered embarrassment explaining the incident to his family, developed a facial twitch and insomnia, lost weight, and was banned from Barnes & Noble for the rest of his life. An expert testified that Barnes & Noble did not have any policies or procedures to prevent employees from unlawfully detaining customers or exercising unbridled discretion handling customer incidents. The jury awarded Johnson $117,000. Barnes & Noble appealed, arguing that the court should have instructed the jury on whether the store employees could make a citizen’s arrest and detain Johnson based on the misdemeanor alleged by the store clerk, and that the damages were excessive.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.