Kafka v. Hess
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
2017 WL 2439142 (2017)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
George Kafka’s (plaintiff’s) mother deeded him her house, reserving only a life estate for herself. An attorney recorded the deed in 2010. When Kafka arrived for his mother’s funeral, he noticed that most of the valuables in his mother’s house had disappeared, and his aunt, Gladys Hess (defendant), demanded that he leave. Kafka was unsure of his rights and decided to stay away from his aunt. Kafka later learned Hess was trying to sell the house even though she admitted a title search showed the deed had been transferred to Kafka. Kafka tried to sell the prospective buyers the property, but a second deed recorded in 2011 made the title uninsurable. The second deed purported to transfer the house to Hess, contingent on Kafka’s mother not exercising a reserved right of disposition during her lifetime. An attorney wrote a letter to Kafka stating that because Hess had expended over $71,000 maintaining and preparing the property for sale, Hess should receive half the sale proceeds. Kafka sued for declaratory judgment in federal court. Hess brought a state lawsuit, which the court consolidated with the federal action. Hess conceded that Kafka was the property’s rightful owner but demanded restitution. Kafka moved for summary judgment regarding restitution.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bredar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.