Kawaauhau v. Geiger
United States Supreme Court
523 U.S. 57 (1998)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Margaret Kawaauhau (plaintiff) saw Dr. Paul Geiger (defendant) for a foot injury. Geiger gave her oral penicillin despite knowing that intravenous penicillin would be more effective. Later, he suspended treatment under the erroneous belief that her infection was cleared. The infection persisted and resulted in Kawaauhau’s leg being amputated below the knee. Kawaauhau and her husband Solomon (plaintiff) sued Geiger for malpractice. A jury awarded the Kawaauhaus $355,000 in damages. Geiger did not carry malpractice insurance. He filed a petition for bankruptcy. The Kawaauhaus asked the bankruptcy court to deem the malpractice judgment nondischargeable on the grounds that it arose from a “willful and malicious injury” committed by Geiger. The bankruptcy court agreed with the Kawaauhaus and ruled the debt nondischargeable. The district court affirmed. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed on the grounds that “willful and malicious injury” refers to an intentional tort, in contrast to reckless or negligent conduct underlying a malpractice claim. The Kawaauhaus petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.