Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
K

Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park

527 A.2d 988 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
527 A.2d 988 (1987)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Harvey and Marsha Kazatsky (plaintiffs) purchased cemetery plots in King David Memorial Park (King David) (defendant) for the burial of twins who had been born prematurely. After the funeral, King David refused to install gravesite markers without first receiving payment. King David eventually installed the markers but advised the Kazatskys that the gravesites would not be maintained unless the bill was paid. As the Kazatskys left the cemetery after the gravestone unveiling, they were reminded that there would be no maintenance unless the fee was paid. The Kazatskys were upset and decided not to pay the bill. Conditions at the gravesites deteriorated, and the marker began to sink. The Kazatskys sued King David for intentional infliction of emotional distress, claiming that King David’s use of threats to coerce them into buying a perpetual-care contract for the gravesites constituted outrageous conduct. The Kazatskys did not seek professional medical help for their alleged distress and presented no expert evidence to support their injury allegations. The trial court granted King David’s motion for a nonsuit. The superior court affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The Kazatskys appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Nix, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms

Related Videos