Kearns v. Ford Motor Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
567 F.3d 1120 (2009)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
Ford Motor Company (defendant) offered vehicles for sale under a program called Certified Pre-Owned. According to Ford, vehicles in this program were put through a rigorous inspection process in order to certify that the vehicle’s safety, reliability, and road-worthiness surpassed noncertified used vehicles. Vehicles in the Certified Pre-Owned program were sold at a premium relative to ordinary used cars. William Kearns (plaintiff) brought a class-action lawsuit against Ford, alleging that Ford knowingly made false and misleading statements about the safety and reliability of its Certified Pre-Owned vehicles. Kearns alleged that this conduct occurred with an intent to induce reliance and defraud consumers. Kearns’s action was brought under state law. Kearns argued that his claims should not be subject to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)’s requirement that allegations of fraud be pleaded with particularity. Kearns’s argument rested on three grounds: (1) state law precedent was contrary to Rule 9(b), (2) some of his claims were not based in fraud, and (3) the complaint should have been evaluated under state law. The trial court dismissed the case. Kearns appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.