Keilbach v. McCullough

669 N.E.2d 1052 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Keilbach v. McCullough

Indiana Court of Appeals
669 N.E.2d 1052 (1996)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD

Facts

Dorothea McCullough (plaintiff) purchased 120 acres of land from Charles Keilbach (defendant). As part of this sale transaction, Keilbach gave McCullough a warranty deed. Sid Martin owned property adjacent to the 120-acre tract. Several years later, when McCullough put the land on the market, Martin claimed adverse possession of a 7-acre portion of McCullough’s property that was adjacent to his land. To quiet title to the disputed 7 acres, McCullough sued Martin. McCullough won the case against Martin, successfully proving the 7 acres belonged to her. Then McCullough sued Keilbach for breach of the warranty deed. Pursuant to the warranty deed, Keilbach was obligated to defend McCullough’s title to the land against all lawful claims. McCullough argued that Keilbach had breached this warranty because he had not defended her title to the 7-acre tract. Rather, McCullough had defended the title herself. The trial court agreed and ruled in favor of McCullough. Keilbach appealed, arguing that he had not breached the warranty deed because McCullough’s efforts to defend the property’s title against Martin’s claim had been successful.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership