Kirschner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
79 F.4th 290 (2023)
- Written by David Bloom, JD
Facts
Pursuant to a credit agreement, Millennium Health LLC, Inc. (Millennium) received loans from various banks and lending institutions (the lenders) (defendants). As a result of a federal investigation and litigation with a competitor, Millennium entered into a loan-syndication agreement with the lenders who had purchased notes from Millennium for the purpose of refinancing the initial loans. The lenders executed a confidential memorandum confirming that the lenders were sophisticated and experienced in extending credit. Motivated to make a profit, the lenders entered into a new credit agreement pursuant to which the notes were secured by collateral. The new credit agreement also created a secondary market for the notes, meaning that the notes could be resold to other lenders. Assignment of the notes was restricted, meaning that the notes could not be distributed to the general public. Millennium filed for bankruptcy after the federal investigation and litigation with a competitor concluded that Millennium broke the law by engaging in unfair competition. Mark S. Kirschner (the trustee) (plaintiff) was appointed as Millennium’s bankruptcy trustee. The trustee filed suit against the lenders, claiming that the notes associated with the loan syndication violated securities laws. The lenders motioned to dismiss. The district court granted the motion, finding that the notes were not securities and thus were not regulated by securities laws. The trustee appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cabranes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.