Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Knorr-Bremse Systeme v. Dana Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
383 F.3d 1337 (2004)


Facts

Knorr-Bremse Systeme (Knorr) (plaintiff) owned a patent for air-disk brakes used in large trucks. A Swedish company named Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Haldex) (defendant) manufactured Mark II brakes. Dana Corporation (defendant) imported the Mark II brakes and installed them into a number of trucks. Knorr notified Dana both orally and in writing of ongoing infringement disputes with Haldex involving the Mark II brakes. Knorr sued Dana and Haldex for infringement. Haldex moved for summary judgment, arguing that the newly modified Mark III brake model was non-infringing. Knorr moved for summary judgment of infringement. The district court granted Knorr’s motion in connection with the Mark II brake, but set the Mark III infringement issue for trial. Despite the judgment, Dana continued to operate trucks incorporating the Mark II brakes. At trial, the issue of willful infringement was raised. Haldex stated that it had consulted counsel regarding Knorr’s patent. Haldex refused to disclose the substance of the legal opinion, citing attorney-client privilege. Dana did not consult counsel, but instead relied upon Haldex to do so. The district court inferred that the withheld opinion was likely unfavorable to Dana and Haldex, and that Dana’s continued used of the Mark II brakes in the face of the unfavorable opinion constituted willful infringement. On that basis, the court awarded Knorr attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Dana and Haldex appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.