From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Kost v. Kraft
North Dakota Supreme Court
795 N.W.2d 712 (2011)
Jim Kost (plaintiff) and Allen Kraft (defendant) worked together in a custom-combining partnership. They terminated the partnership in 2003 but continued sharing work and equipment. In 2008, Kost sued Kraft to resolve how to divide proceeds from sold equipment and to recover for a planter Kost allegedly converted to his own use. Kraft counterclaimed, asserting that Kost had orally agreed to lease some combining equipment from Kost at fair rental value. Kraft claimed Kost used the equipment, but never paid approximately $150,000 owed under the oral lease. Kraft also claimed that the two had an oral agreement for Kraft to do work for Kost in 2005, but Kost never paid Kraft $10,000 for that work. Meanwhile, Kraft had filed for bankruptcy but did not disclose those counterclaims in his bankruptcy proceedings. The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing Kraft’s counterclaims, reasoning that the statute of frauds barred recovery under the oral agreement, and that the part-performance exception did not apply because the oral agreements between the two mostly involved trading work and equipment. In other words, the court thought the parties’ prior work arrangements could explain their conduct, not just the existence of an oral agreement. The trial court also reasoned that Kraft’s not properly disclosing his counterclaims in his bankruptcy proceedings barred him from pursuing them in this lawsuit. Kraft appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Maring, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.