Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Michael Baker International, Inc.

2022 WL 1568923 (2022)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Michael Baker International, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Utah
2022 WL 1568923 (2022)

Facts

JoElle Satterthwaite and her son (plaintiffs) were injured in a car accident. The collision occurred at an intersection where engineering firm Michael Baker International, Inc. (Michael Baker) (defendant) was working on a construction project. The Satterthwaites brought suit against Michael Baker, alleging that the firm breached its duty of care with regard to traffic control at the intersection. Michael Baker’s primary insurer was Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Liberty) (plaintiff), under a policy that limited claims to $2 million each. However, Michael Baker had a separate, third-party insurance policy that capped claims at $15 million, subrogated to Michael Baker’s recovery of actual damages. Liberty initially provided Michael Baker with a defense attorney. The Satterthwaites sought to settle with Michael Baker for $12 million, but the Liberty attorney rejected the proposal. Liberty then filed its own action against Michael Baker, seeking a declaratory judgment that Liberty was not obligated to provide coverage or legal defense in the Satterthwaites’ action. Michael Baker hired new counsel, who succeeded in settling the Satterthwaite case for $13 million. Through the third-party policy, Vermont General Insurance Company (VGIC) reimbursed Michael Baker for the $13 million settlement, plus $439,446 in fees for Michael Baker’s new legal representation. Michael Baker counterclaimed against Liberty for breach of contract, seeking to recover the $13,439,446 in damages (i.e., the settlement amount plus the legal costs). Liberty moved for partial summary judgment, arguing that VGIC had already made Michael Baker whole for the full damages amount.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parrish, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership