Lifshutz v. Lifshutz
Texas Court of Appeals
61 S.W.3d 511 (2001)
- Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD
Facts
James (defendant) and Kymberly Lifshutz (plaintiff) were married. James acquired an interest in several companies (the companies) (defendants) before the marriage. During the marriage, James dominated the corporations, disregarded the corporate forms, and used corporate funds for personal and community expenses. James’s misuse of the companies resulted in a benefit to the community at the expense of the companies. Kymberly sued James for a divorce and sued the companies to pierce the corporate veils using the alter-ego doctrine. The trial court pierced the companies’ corporate veils and characterized one-third of the companies’ assets as community property. The trial court awarded Kymberly only 25 percent of the community estate. Both Kymberly and the companies appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Green, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.