Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corporation

137 S. Ct. 553 (2017)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corporation

United States Supreme Court

137 S. Ct. 553 (2017)

Facts

In 1938, the Fair Housing Administration chartered the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) (defendant). In 1954, Congress rechartered Fannie Mae. In the new charter, Congress revised the sue-or-be-sued clause (the clause), which conferred jurisdiction on certain courts with respect to suits by or against Fannie Mae. The clause gave Fannie Mae the power “to sue and to be sued, and to complain and to defend, in any court of competent jurisdiction, State or Federal.” In 1999, Beverly Ann Hollis-Arrington (plaintiff) refinanced her mortgage owned by Cendant Mortgage Corporation (Cendant) (defendant). Cendant sold the mortgage to Fannie Mae. When Hollis-Arrington was unable to make her payments, Cendant repurchased the mortgage from Fannie Mae. Hollis-Arrington and her daughter, Crystal Lightfoot (plaintiff) attempted to stave off foreclosure, but they failed, and the house was sold. Hollis-Arrington and Lightfoot brought two unsuccessful suits in federal court. Subsequently, Hollis-Arrington and Lightfoot filed suit against Fannie Mae in state court, alleging that deficiencies in the refinancing and foreclosure processes entitled them to relief. Fannie Mae removed the case to federal court, relying on the clause as a basis for federal jurisdiction. Hollis-Arrington and Lightfoot moved to remand the case to state court, which the federal district court denied. Then, the district court dismissed the claims against Fannie Mae based on claim preclusion. The court of appeals affirmed. Hollis-Arrington and Lightfoot appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sotomayor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership