From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...
Linden v. CNH America, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
673 F.3d 829 (2012)
Thomas Linden Jr. (plaintiff) suffered severe injury when he was ejected from the cab of a bulldozer in a rollover accident. He brought a products-liability lawsuit against the bulldozer manufacturer, CNH America, LLC, and the seatbelt manufacturer, IMMI (together, defendants). Linden claimed the seatbelt buckle had three manufacturing defects: the casing lacked sufficient UV-resistant material to prevent degradation, lacked strengthening polycarbonate, and fit the ejector holder too loosely. The court dismissed the claims against the seatbelt manufacturer as time-barred by the applicable statute of repose and granted a directed verdict for CNH on Linden’s manufacturing defect claims. Linden appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Shepherd, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.