Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
34 F.3d 1173 (1994)


Facts

Sidney Lundy (plaintiff), age 66, suffered a heart attack while playing blackjack at TropWorld Casino (TropWorld) owned by Adamar of New Jersey, Inc. (defendant). Immediately after collapsing onto the floor, Lundy was assisted by three other nearby patrons of the casino, two of which were physicians and one an emergency care nurse who provided aid. Additionally, casino personnel called for medical assistance to be provided by a nurse employed by TropWorld. Nurse Slusher arrived at Lundy’s location within two minutes of the call with an ambu-bag and oxygen. The physician patrons requested an intubation tube in order to establish an airway and to provide oxygen to Lundy in a more efficient manner. However, Slusher did not bring an intubation tube to the scene because it was TropWorld policy not to do so and she was not qualified to use it despite there being one located on the premises. Slusher and the three patrons performed CPR on Lundy until offsite paramedics arrived at TropWorld. The paramedics eventually intubated Lundy and revived him. Lundy suffered permanent injuries. Lundy filed suit in federal district court against TropWorld alleging the casino owed a duty to have a full-time physician onsite to perform basic first aid to a patron. The district court disagreed and found that TropWorld was not negligent in carrying out its duty of care to its customers. The district court granted summary judgment to TropWorld. Lundy appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stapleton, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.