Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

M.G. Bancorporation v. Le Beau

737 A.2d 513 (1999)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 32,200+ case briefs...

M.G. Bancorporation v. Le Beau

Delaware Supreme Court

737 A.2d 513 (1999)

Facts

Southwest Bancorp, Inc. (Southwest) (defendant) owned over 91 percent of the outstanding common stock of M. G. Bancorporation, Inc. (MGB) (defendant), a corporation with a controlling interest in two subsidiaries. MGB merged into Southwest through a short-form merger, which did not require shareholder approval. MGB’s minority shareholders were offered $41 per share as merger consideration. Southwest’s appraiser made the $41 per share valuation by applying a minority discount to the shares. A group of minority shareholders (the plaintiff shareholders) (plaintiffs) rejected the offer and sought to exercise their appraisal rights under 8 Delaware Code § 262. In a separate lawsuit, the Delaware Chancery Court found that Southwest’s appraiser had breached his fiduciary duty to the minority shareholders by improperly applying a minority discount to their shares. In the appraisal proceeding, the plaintiff shareholders presented evidence that their shares were worth $85 per share. The plaintiff shareholders used a combination of the comparative publicly traded approach, the discounted-cash-flow method, and the comparative-acquisitions approach. MGB and Southwest presented evidence that the shares were worth approximately $42 per share using a combination of the discounted-cash-flow method and a capital-markets analysis. In their discounted-cash-flow methods, the plaintiff shareholders applied a control premium to account for the controlling interest that MGB had in its two subsidiaries, and MGB and Southwest did not. The plaintiff shareholders argued that MGB and Southwest’s capital-markets analysis was not generally accepted in the financial industry. The Delaware Chancery Court ordered MGB and Southwest to explain how their new appraisal methods resulted in a price that was extremely similar to their earlier improper method. After hearing testimony, the court concluded that the capital-markets analysis contained an improper minority discount. The court found that the shares were worth $85 each and ordered MGB and Southwest to pay for the shares with 8 percent interest compounded monthly. MGB and Southwest appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 585,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 585,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 32,200 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership