Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Madey v. Duke University

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
307 F.3d 1351 (2002)


Facts

In the mid-1980s, Dr. John M.J. Madey (“Madey”) (plaintiff) was a tenured research professor at Stanford University where he headed a well-respected free electron laser (“FEL”) research laboratory and owned several patents practiced by some of the lab’s equipment. Subsequently, Madey left Stanford for the physics department at Duke University (“Duke”) (defendant) where he was named director of a similarly-situated laser research lab. Madey also moved the equipment from the Stanford FEL lab to the Duke campus. After nearly a decade at Duke, Madey and the university had a falling out when Madey complained that Duke wanted to use the lab’s equipment for research areas outside the allowed scope of government funding. Duke subsequently removed Madey as lab director and Madey resigned in 1998. Duke continued to operate some of the equipment in the lab and Madey brought suit against Duke for patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. The district court granted Duke’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the experimental use defense applied to the university’s use of Madey’s patented laser technology. Madey appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Gajarsa, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.