From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
79 F.3d 1572 (Fed Cir. 1996)
Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar (plaintiff) filed a patent application on October 24, 1983 for a double-lumen catheter for use in dialysis patients. Mahurkar granted C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc., and Bard Access Systems, Inc. (collectively, Bard) (defendant) a license under the patent. Bard violated the license, and Mahurkar filed a patent infringement suit against Bard. Bard contended that the patent was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) because, in July 1983, Cook, Inc. published a national catalog disclosing a double-lumen catheter. At trial, Mahurkar established that he began work on the catheter in 1979, and, in the ensuing years, made the catheters in his home. During this time, Mahurkar conducted tests on the catheters and worked to identify companies that could develop catheter tubing with material suitable for human use. Bard moved for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that the Cook catalog anticipated Mahurkar’s patent. Mahurkar also moved for JMOL. The district court granted Mahurkar’s motion, concluding that no reasonable jury could find that the Cook catalog constituted prior art barring Mahurkar’s patent. Bard appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rader, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 606,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.