Mangum v. Town of Holly Springs

551 F. Supp. 2d 439 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mangum v. Town of Holly Springs

United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
551 F. Supp. 2d 439 (2008)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

Melanie Mangum (plaintiff) worked in various roles for the Town of Holly Springs (the town) (defendant) from 1995 until she became a firefighter in 2006. At the time, the town employed 30 other firefighters, and all of them were men. Before Mangum accepted the firefighter position, she heard from another city employee that the fire department’s engineer, Eric Wood, said that he was not comfortable with Mangum as a female firefighter and would refuse to fight a fire with Mangum on his team. Mangum complained to the fire department chief, Cecil Parker, and eventually, the town’s human-resources director, Parker, and Mangum agreed that Mangum would accept the job on the condition that Mangum and Wood would work different shifts. Mangum was assigned to a smaller fire station that probationary firefighters were normally not assigned to, which she believed deprived her of training and advancement opportunities and limited her engagement with coworkers. Mangum alleged that the town was slow to issue her protective equipment. Mangum also repeatedly complained about her coworkers’ frequent use of foul language, including “mother f-ker, f-ker, c-ksucker, son-of-b-ch, p-ssy, and G-damn.” As a result of her complaints, Mangum was told that she needed to watch her back, and Mangum noticed that even more firefighters began using profanity near her. Ultimately, Mangum took time off under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) due to her mental anguish over her work environment and need to care for her sick parents. Mangum resigned after her FMLA leave ran out. After exhausting her administrative options with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Mangum then sued the town in federal court. The town moved to dismiss Mangum’s claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Britt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership