Marquay v. Eno

662 A.2d 272 (1995)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marquay v. Eno

New Hampshire Supreme Court
662 A.2d 272 (1995)

Play video

Facts

Yvonne Marquay and two others (the students) (plaintiffs) were students in the Mascoma Valley Regional School District (the district) (defendant). Each student sued the district and various teachers and administrators (defendants) in federal district court, alleging that she was sexually assaulted by one or more district employees, including coach Michael Eno (defendant). The students alleged that the parties negligently failed to protect students that they knew or should have known were being abused. In support of their negligence argument, the students pointed to a New Hampshire criminal statute (the reporting statute) requiring any person having a reason to suspect child abuse to report that suspicion to the state. The students argued that the statute established a duty of care and the district and its employees breached that duty by failing to report suspected abuse. The federal district court certified questions to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, seeking clarification regarding the state’s negligence laws.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Horton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership