Martin v. Mann Merchandising, Inc.
Texas Court of Civil Appeals
570 S.W.2d 208 (1978)
- Written by Kelsey Libby, JD
Facts
Gordon Martin (plaintiff) was employed by Mann Merchandising, Inc. (Mann) (defendant) as an at-will employee for over 11 years. Martin became a regional manager about a year and a half before his employment was terminated. According to Martin, Mann’s policy upon termination of employment was to pay one week of severance pay for every year of service, along with two weeks of vacation pay. Martin alleged that he first learned of the policy from other departing regional managers after he moved into that role and that he did not know exactly how it was calculated but they told him it was very, very generous. The policy was not the reason that he took the regional-manager position or remained in it because he planned to stay at Mann forever. No representative of Mann ever told him that the policy was to pay one week of severance pay for every year of service along with two weeks of vacation pay. When Martin’s employment ended, he was only paid half that amount. Martin sued Mann for severance and vacation pay based on a contract implied in fact. The trial court granted summary judgment for Mann, and Martin appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McCloud, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
