From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Matter of Greystone III Joint Venture
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
995 F.2d 1274 (1991)
Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Corporation (Phoenix) (plaintiff) loaned $8,800,000 to Greystone III Joint Venture (Greystone) (defendant) to purchase an office building. The nonrecourse loan was secured by a first lien on the property. When Greystone defaulted, Phoenix initiated foreclosure proceedings. Greystone then filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. At that point, Greystone owed approximately $9,325,000 to Phoenix, $10,000 to various trade creditors, and $145,000 to taxing authorities. The bankruptcy court valued the office building at approximately $5,825,000, leaving Phoenix with an unsecured deficiency of $3,500,000. Greystone proposed a reorganization plan under which unsecured claims were separated into three classes: Phoenix’s deficiency claim, the trade creditors’ claims, and claims held by office-building tenants in their security deposits. Under the plan, Phoenix and the trade creditors would receive between three and four cents on the dollar but the trade creditors’ balance would be paid in full after plan confirmation. The tenants, whose leases would be assumed by Greystone, would receive 25 percent of their deposits on plan approval and 50 percent on the expiration of their leases. The balance would be paid on plan confirmation. Phoenix objected to the plan. At a confirmation hearing, Greystone orally modified the plan to withdraw the post-confirmation payments to the trade creditors and tenants. The bankruptcy court ruled that the tenants were not entitled to vote but that the plan was otherwise confirmable. The district court affirmed plan confirmation but disagreed with the bankruptcy court as to the tenants, concluding that they were entitled to vote. Phoenix appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Edith H. Jones, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 619,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 619,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.