McCollum v. Clothier

241 P.2d 468 (1952)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCollum v. Clothier

Utah Supreme Court
241 P.2d 468 (1952)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD
Play video

Facts

Clothier (defendant) held the mortgage of various property owned by a company that went into bankruptcy. Clothier foreclosed on the mortgage. McCollum (plaintiff) assisted the trustee in bankruptcy, helping to sell some of the property during the bankruptcy process. Clothier, through his attorney, Iverson, solicited assistance from McCollum in dealing with the property and lining up prospective buyers for the forthcoming sale of equipment because McCollum performed his duties for the trustee well and enlisting his services given his familiarity with the property was logical. McCollum obliged and performed a significant amount of work to Clothier’s benefit related to the sale of various property. Clothier knew McCollum had been working to his benefit as he had talked directly to McCollum. After the sale, Clothier denied payment to McCollum for services rendered in relation to the sale. McCollum brought a lawsuit for breach of implied contract and recovery under the principle of quantum meruit. The lower court entered judgment for McCollum. Clothier appealed to the Utah Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Crockett, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership