From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
McLain v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
533 P.2d 343 (1975)
Wayne McLain (plaintiff) worked for Boise Cascade Corporation (Boise) (defendant). McLain injured his back at work and started receiving workers’-compensation payments. McLain’s doctor advised Boise that McLain might be disabled for up to 12 months. Boise arranged for another doctor to take an X-ray. The consulting doctor informed Boise that McLain might be feigning disability. McLain was told his workers’-compensation benefits would be discontinued. McLain returned to work but remained in pain. McLain retained an attorney to seek reinstatement of his workers’-compensation benefits. Boise hired United Diversified Services, Inc. (United) (defendant) to conduct surveillance of McLain. United’s employees filmed McLain during daylight hours while he was engaged in activities on his property outside his home. Some filming was done from a neighbor’s barn, and some was likely done from a narrow strip on the border of McLain’s property. The investigator was unaware that he was on McLain’s property. McLain noticed the investigator once, and the investigator left the area. McLain did not know he had been filmed until the film was shown at the workers’-compensation hearing. McLain acknowledged at the hearing that the activities in which he had been engaged could have been seen by neighbors or passersby and that he was not embarrassed or upset by the surveillance. He was angry about being filmed without having been informed, and he did not believe anyone had the right to be on his property without permission. The court granted Boise and United’s motion for a nonsuit. McLain appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McAllister, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.