McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education

529 F. Supp. 1255 (1982)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
529 F. Supp. 1255 (1982)

Facts

In 1981, Arkansas passed Act 590 in an attempt to balance public schools’ science curriculum on evolution science by adding creation science to the curriculum. Evolution science was based on Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and had been part of the science curriculum of public schools since the late 1950s. Creation science—which was not science according to the essential characteristics of science or the work of scientists—was based on the fundamentalist Christian beliefs that the world was created from nothing and that there was a worldwide flood, which are both stories from the Bible’s Book of Genesis. The act’s definition of creation science included these beliefs, but without specific reference to the Bible. The act was drafted by Paul Ellwanger, a Christian who founded an organization to promote fairness in education and believed that the teaching of evolution was harmful for society. In his communications with politicians while campaigning for the act’s adoption, Ellwanger acknowledged that the true purpose of the act was to advance religious precepts related to creation science; however, he emphasized the benefit of concealing that fact and promoting the act as having a secular purpose. Ellwanger’s act was eventually sent to Senator James L. Holsted, who was a Christian. Without consulting any other parties or referring the act to a senate committee, Holsted introduced the act in the Arkansas Senate, and it was quickly passed. The Arkansas House of Representatives also quickly passed the act after little consideration. Several churches, church officials, religious and secular organizations, teachers, and parents (collectively, plaintiffs) filed suit, claiming, in part, that the act violated the Establishment Clause.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Overton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership