Means v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

836 F.3d 643 (2016)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Means v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
836 F.3d 643 (2016)

  • Written by Tiffany Hester, JD

Facts

Mercy Health Partners is a Catholic hospital in Michigan under the supervision of Catholic Health Ministries (CHM) (defendant). CHM required Mercy to follow ethical and religious directives published by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). On December 1, 2020, Tamesha Means (plaintiff) went into labor when she was 18 weeks pregnant and sought treatment at Mercy. The doctors discovered the fetus still had a heartbeat, but the amniotic sac had ruptured, a condition that endangers the mother’s health and typically leads to stillbirth. However, the doctors did not share that information with Means or offer Means an abortion or any treatment that would complete the miscarriage. Instead, the doctors sent Means home with some pain medication. Means returned the following morning with pain and bleeding, but Mercy sent her home after Means’s fever subsided. That night, Means returned and delivered her baby, who died soon after. Two years later, a public health worker learned about Means’s ordeal and talked to Mercy’s vice president. The vice president stated that the USCCB ethical directives prohibited Mercy from inducing labor or offering an abortion in Means’s case. The statute of limitations barred Means from suing Mercy for malpractice. Therefore, Means sued USCCB and CHM for negligence, alleging that the directives caused Mercy to withhold information about the risks of Means’s condition and treatment options. Means asserted that she suffered physical, psychological, and emotional pain. After dismissing the claim against USCCB for lack of personal jurisdiction, the district court dismissed the claim against CHM for failure to state a claim. Means appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Batchelder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership