Mellet v. Ireland, Whelan v. Ireland

Communication No. 2324/2013 (2016), Communication No. 2425/2014 (2017)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mellet v. Ireland, Whelan v. Ireland

United Nations Human Rights Committee
Communication No. 2324/2013 (2016), Communication No. 2425/2014 (2017)

Facts

Amanda Mellet and Siobhán Whelan (plaintiffs) were pregnant residents of Ireland (defendant). Mellet and Whelan learned that their pregnancies were not viable due to fetal impairments, but the women were unable to terminate their pregnancies in Ireland because Irish law prohibited and criminalized abortion. Mellet and Whelan thus faced the choice of carrying nonviable pregnancies to term in Ireland or traveling to another country to obtain abortion services. Mellet and Whelan alleged that they suffered physical and mental distress that was heightened by the inability to receive medical care and medical information from familiar and trusted providers in Ireland, the shame and stigma associated with the criminalization of abortion even in the event of a nonviable pregnancy, and the prospect of traveling outside Ireland to obtain an abortion at personal expense and without familiar support structures in place, among other things. Mellet and Whelan filed communications against Ireland with the United Nations Human Rights Committee, asserting violations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (the covenant). Specifically, Mellet and Whelan asserted violations of (1) article 7 of the covenant, which protects against cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, (2) article 17 of the covenant, which protects against arbitrary or unlawful interference with an individual’s privacy, and (3) article 26 of the covenant, which protects against discrimination.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership