Meyer v. Law
Florida Supreme Court
287 So. 2d 37 (1973)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Neil Law and his wife Lucille Law (defendants) obtained an incorrect survey of their property. The survey stated that the Laws’ property was larger than it was. Relying on this survey, the Laws built a fence that enclosed a portion of a property belonging to John Meyer and his wife Leona Meyer (plaintiffs). The Laws maintained and cultivated this portion of land. The Meyers’ and the Laws’ titles each reflected the true boundary line, and they each paid taxes based on the true boundary line. The Laws claimed to have acquired title to the enclosed portion of land by adverse possession. The circuit court found in favor of the Laws. The district court of appeal affirmed. The Florida Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boyd, J.)
Dissent (Adkins, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.