Miles, Inc. v. Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
810 F. Supp. 1091 (1993)
- Written by Elliot Stern, JD
Facts
A pharmaceutical company, Miles, Inc. (plaintiff), and Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation (Scripps) (defendant) jointly owned Scripps-Miles, Inc., a corporation formed to sell immunochemical materials. Dr. Theodore Zimmerman (defendant) was retained by Scripps-Miles as a consultant in 1980. Zimmerman provided the Scripps-Miles monoclonal laboratory with an antigen that led to the production of a cell line, a population of identical cells derived from a single cell. Zimmerman used the cell line to develop a process for purifying Factor VIII:C, which facilitates blood clotting in hemophiliacs. Zimmerman patented the process and assigned his patent rights to Scripps, which licensed these rights to Armour (defendant) and Revlon (defendant). In 1982, Scripps-Miles dissolved, and Miles received ownership of the monoclonal laboratory. Zimmerman continued to use the cell line after the dissolution. Miles sued, alleging that Scripps had conspired with Zimmerman to transfer the right to commercialize the cell line to Scripps. Miles further contended that the transfer of the cell line to Armour and Revlon had deprived Miles of its ownership interest in the right to commercialize the cell line.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rhoades, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.