Milliken v. Jacono

103 A.3d 806 (2014)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Milliken v. Jacono

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
103 A.3d 806 (2014)

Facts

Joseph and Kathleen Jacono (defendants) purchased a house in which a highly publicized murder-suicide had occurred a few months earlier. The Jaconos consulted with various parties—their attorney, their agents at Re/Max Town & Country (defendant), and employees of the Pennsylvania Real Estate Commission—all of which told the Jaconos that the murder-suicide did not constitute a material defect necessitating disclosure. The Jaconos invested in renovating the property and put it up for sale, omitting mention of the murder-suicide in their property-disclosure statement. Janet Milliken (plaintiff) purchased the home and claimed to have learned of the murder-suicide only after moving in. Milliken brought an action to rescind the purchase, arguing that the Jaconos had failed to disclose a material defect. More specifically, Milliken alleged negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Jaconos. Milliken appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Eakin, J.)

Concurrence (Todd, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership