Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Miron v. Yonkers Raceway, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
400 F.2d 112 (1968)


Adrien and Gerard Miron (plaintiffs) owned a horse. The Mirons wanted to sell the horse in an auction. The Mirons consigned the horse to Yonkers Raceway, Inc. (Raceway) (defendant). The parties’ contract stated that the risk of loss would pass to the buyer once the auctioneer’s hammer fell. Saul Finkelstein (defendant) won the auction. Although it was customary to examine a horse immediately following an auction, Finkelstein took the horse home without examining it. The next day, Finkelstein’s horse trainer noticed that the horse’s hind leg was swollen. After working with the horse, the trainer determined that the horse was lame. Finkelstein took x-rays of the horse’s leg. Finkelstein notified the Mirons that the horse was lame and demanded that the Mirons take the horse back. Finkelstein refused to pay for the horse, and the Mirons sued Finkelstein for breach of contract. Finkelstein counterclaimed for breach of warranty. Finkelstein presented expert testimony that the horse had a broken splint bone, and that the injury was two or three weeks old at the time of the auction. The Mirons presented contrary expert testimony suggesting that the x-rays were not taken the day after the auction, but at a later date. The trial court concluded that the parties could not establish when the x-rays were taken. The Mirons also presented testimony from witnesses who had inspected the horse on the day of the auction and said that nothing was wrong with the horse. The district court held that Finkelstein had the burden of proving the horse’s lameness at the time of auction, and that Finkelstein had failed to carry that burden. The district court entered judgment for the Mirons, and Finkelstein appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 497,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 497,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial