Logourl black

Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan

United States Supreme Court
458 U.S. 718 (1982)


Facts

The Mississippi University for Women (MUW) (defendant) was a state-sponsored single-sex public university. MUW upheld a policy of excluding men from admission. Joe Hogan (plaintiff) was a registered nurse in Mississippi that did not hold a degree in nursing. However, he had worked for over five years as a nursing supervisor in Columbus, Mississippi; the city in which MUW was located. In 1979, he applied for admission to MUW’s School of Nursing degree program, but was denied admission because he was male despite the fact that he was otherwise qualified. Hogan brought suit against MUW in federal district court on the grounds that his denial of admission violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court upheld MUW’s admissions policy, holding that it furthered a legitimate state purpose, but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Powell, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 90,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 12,195 briefs - keyed to 164 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now