Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
United States Supreme Court
458 U.S. 718 (1982)
The Mississippi University for Women (MUW) (defendant) was a state-sponsored single-sex public university. MUW upheld a policy of excluding men from admission. Joe Hogan (plaintiff) was a registered nurse in Mississippi that did not hold a degree in nursing. However, he had worked for over five years as a nursing supervisor in Columbus, Mississippi; the city in which MUW was located. In 1979, he applied for admission to MUW’s School of Nursing degree program, but was denied admission because he was male despite the fact that he was otherwise qualified. Hogan brought suit against MUW in federal district court on the grounds that his denial of admission violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court upheld MUW’s admissions policy, holding that it furthered a legitimate state purpose, but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.