Moore v. El Paso Chamber of Commerce
Texas Court of Civil Appeals
220 S.W.2d 327 (1949)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
The El Paso Chamber of Commerce (defendant) promoted its annual rodeo and livestock show by encouraging citizens to dress western. Those not wearing western attire in public could be roped, put in corrals, and lightly shocked in an electrified hot seat until they purchased either rodeo tickets or neckerchiefs to wear. The Chamber did not hire anyone to rope people, but had a representative supervising the corrals, and young men volunteered to rope people and bring them to the corrals. Claude Weaver joined in for a day and a half, roping and bringing in people. Weaver and two other ropers approached Moore (plaintiff) and her mother downtown, saying “Let’s get that girl” or “Let’s get that one.” The two women ran into a hotel drugstore to avoid being roped. Weaver chased them. When Moore tried to escape into the adjoining hotel, she put her hand through a glass door panel, suffering severe cuts. Moore sued the Chamber for assault. The jury found that the ropers were acting within the Chamber’s scope of authority, that Weaver was negligent, and that Moore suffered damages. However, because the jury found Moore was also negligent, the trial court ruled that contributory negligence barred any recovery. Moore appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sutton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.