Morris v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
685 F.3d 925 (2012)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Glenda Morris (plaintiff) applied for long-term care Medicaid benefits through the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (OKDHS) (defendant). OKDHS denied Glenda’s first Medicaid application, finding that Glenda’s assets exceeded Oklahoma’s $2,000 Medicaid asset limit. Collectively, Glenda and her husband, Leroy Morris (defendant), had over $100,000 in assets. Accordingly, OKDHS set Leroy’s community spouse resource allowance (CSRA) at approximately $50,000, leaving Glenda with about $50,000 in assets subject to the Medicaid asset limit. To spend down assets, Glenda purchased two burial contracts and a $41,000 nontransferable, nonsaleable annuity solely benefitting Leroy. Then, Glenda applied again for Medicaid benefits. OKDHS denied Glenda’s second application, and Glenda requested a hearing. The OKDHS Appeals Committee affirmed the denial, holding that (1) the $41,000 annuity counted toward Glenda’s Medicaid asset limit because it was purchased with Glenda’s assets; and (2) even if the annuity did not count toward Glenda’s Medicaid asset limit, it was subject to a transfer penalty because it was an interspousal asset transfer that brought Leroy’s assets above his CSRA limit. The Morrises appealed to federal district court. The district court affirmed, holding a community spouse could not acquire an annuity in excess of their CSRA after the institutionalized spouse’s initial Medicaid eligibility determination. The Morrises appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lucero, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.