Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Morton Salt Co. v. G.S. Suppiger Co.

United States Supreme Court
314 U.S. 488 (1942)


Facts

G.S. Suppiger Co. (Suppiger) (plaintiff) held a patent for a machine that deposited salt tablets into cans during the canning process. Suppiger also owned a subsidiary that manufactured salt tablets for use in Suppiger’s machines, but these salt tablets were unpatented. Suppiger leased over 200 of its salt deposition machines to commercial canneries using a license agreement. The license agreement’s terms forced the canneries to use Suppiger’s unpatented salt tablets in Suppiger’s patented machines. In other words, Suppiger tied the use of its machines to the use of its tablets. This type of arrangement is sometimes referred to as a tying arrangement. Morton Salt Co. (Morton) (defendant) also manufactured machines for depositing salt tablets, but Morton’s machines were unpatented. Suppiger sued Morton, alleging infringement of the patent for Suppiger’s salt-depositing machines and seeking an injunction against Morton. Morton moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted Morton’s motion and dismissed Suppiger’s complaint. The trial court found that Suppiger was misusing its patent to restrain the sale of salt tablets by competitors. Thus, if the trial court enforced Suppiger’s patent, the trial court would be helping enforce an unlawful monopoly. Therefore, the trial court could not enforce the patent. The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stone, C. J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.