Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
California Court of Appeal
33 Cal. App. 4th 1529, 40 Cal. Rptr. 2d 22 (1995)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Robert and Pamela Morton (plaintiffs) filed a strict products liability action against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (Owens-Corning) (defendant) and others for damages arising from Robert’s exposure to asbestos containing products and his development of mesothelioma, an asbestos-caused form of cancer. For approximately three years, Robert worked as a wireman, installing cable on board ships, at the New York Shipbuilding Yard in New Jersey. Nearly thirty years after he had stopped working at the shipyard Robert developed chest pains and flu-like symptoms. Robert was later diagnosed as having mesothelioma. The trial court bifurcated the trial with the issue of damages being tried first. At the liability phase, the Mortons utilized the consumer expectations test to prove that the Owens-Corning product was defective. Owens-Corning filed a motion for nonsuit claiming the consumer expectations test was not applicable. The trial court disagreed, denied the motion, and the jury found Owens-Corning liable and responsible for 12 percent of the damages. Owens-Corning appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Haerle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.