Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. Amazon.com., Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
804 F.3d 930 (2015)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Multi Time Machine, Inc. (Multi Time) (plaintiff) manufactured military-style watches that retailed for several hundred dollars each. Multi Time owned the federally registered trademark “MTM Special Ops.” To maintain its exclusive branding, Multi Time only sold its watches directly and through select retailers. Multi Time did not sell its watches through Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon) (defendant), an online shopping site. Amazon’s website had a search engine for finding products. If a consumer searched for “mtm special ops,” Amazon’s website displayed a list of military-style watches that Amazon did sell. The search-result list included the brand and a picture of each available watch. Multi Time sued Amazon for trademark infringement, alleging that Amazon had created a likelihood of initial-interest confusion because its search results did not state that Amazon did not carry Multi Time watches. The district court granted summary judgment for Amazon and dismissed Multi Time’s infringement claims. Multi Time appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Silverman, J.)
Dissent (Bea, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.