Munn v. The Hotchkiss School

165 A.3d 1167 (2017)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Munn v. The Hotchkiss School

Connecticut Supreme Court
165 A.3d 1167 (2017)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Fifteen-year-old Cara Munn (plaintiff) contracted tick-borne encephalitis on a trip to China organized by the Hotchkiss School (defendant), a private boarding school. Before the trip, the school e-mailed students and parents an itinerary and a link to the CDC website, which erroneously connected to information about Central America instead of China. The e-mail discussed immunizations, prescriptions, and sexually transmitted diseases, but did not warn about insect-borne diseases. Instead the packing list simply included bug spray under “miscellaneous items.” The director of the school’s international programs had viewed the CDC webpage on tick-borne encephalitis in forested regions of northeastern China (which advised wearing long sleeves, pants, and DEET-based repellant), and knew the itinerary included those regions. Yet nobody warned students or parents about insect-borne diseases prevalent there, or told them to wear long sleeves, pants, and DEET. The students hiked up a forested mountain in an affected region wearing shorts, T-shirts, and tank tops. Munn and her companions got lost on the way down and received many insect bites. Ten days later, she came down with encephalitis that caused permanent brain damage. Munn sued the school in federal court and won a $41.5 million jury verdict, including $31.5 million in noneconomic damages. The presiding federal court requested that the Connecticut Supreme Court resolve two state law questions: (1) whether Connecticut public policy imposed a duty on the school to warn about serious insect-borne diseases when organizing trips abroad, and (2) whether state law required reduction of the damages award.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership