NAACP v. Button
United States Supreme Court
371 U.S. 415 (1963)
The Virginia Conference of the NAACP (plaintiff) sought to finance litigation directed at ending racial discrimination in public schools. To accomplish this, members of the Conference held meetings inviting local Virginia parents and children to participate in lawsuits brought by NAACP attorneys. Virginia had historically prohibited certain types of solicitation of legal business. In 1956, Virginia passed Chapter 33 to extend this prohibition to the solicitation of legal business that occurs when an agent for any organization which “employs, retains or compensates” any lawyer “in connection with any judicial proceeding in which it has no pecuniary right or liability.” The NAACP brought a declaratory-judgment action against Virginia's attorney general (defendant), seeking a declaration that Chapter 33 was inapplicable to the Conference's activities, or, if Chapter 33 was applicable, that it was unconstitutional. Both the Richmond City Circuit Court and the Virginia Supreme Court held that Chapter 33 applied to the Conference's activities and that Chapter 33 was constitutional. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.