Nasr and Ghali v. Italy
European Court of Human Rights
Application No. 44883/09 (2016)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Osama Nasr (plaintiff) was an Egyptian citizen who lived in Milan, Italy, with his wife, Nabila Ghali (plaintiff). Nasr had been granted asylum as a political refugee by the Italian government (defendant) because Nasr was a member of an Islamist group that the Egyptian government considered to be terrorist. In 2003, agents from the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) kidnapped Nasr and transferred Nasr to Egypt. The CIA agents acted with the Italian government’s knowledge and Italian agents’ cooperation. Nasr’s kidnapping was a so-called “extraordinary rendition”—a practice used by the United States after the 9/11 terrorist attacks to detain suspected terrorists and transfer them to black sites in countries where the detainees could be interrogated using torture and other tactics that were not allowed in the United States. Following the kidnapping, Nasr was detained and tortured in Egypt for more than a year. After Nasr’s release in 2004, an action was brought in Italian court to prosecute the parties responsible for the kidnapping and detention. However, because the court excluded evidence related to the kidnapping as covered by state-secret protection, the Italian agents involved in the kidnapping could not be convicted. Additionally, because the Italian government never requested the extradition of the American CIA agents, convictions of those agents could not be executed. Nasr and Ghali subsequently brought an action against the Italian government in the European Court of Human Rights. Among other things, Nasr and Ghali asserted a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the convention), which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.