National Alliance v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
710 F.2d 868 (1983)
- Written by Jenny Perry, JD
Facts
National Alliance (plaintiff) published a monthly newsletter for the stated purpose of fostering in White Americans of European ancestry an understanding of and pride in “their racial and cultural heritage and an awareness of the present dangers to that heritage.” The newsletter contained feature articles, stories, and editorials in a form resembling a newspaper. The general theme of the newsletter was that non-White people were inferior to White Americans, as well as brutal and dangerous. To support National Alliance’s position, each newsletter contained one or two news stories reporting incidents of violent crime by Black individuals and identifying Jews as holding prominent positions in the media and elsewhere in order to allegedly manipulate government policy to be harmful to the interests of White Americans. National Alliance used the newsletter to appeal for action, including violence, to cause harm to the disfavored groups. The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) denied National Alliance’s application for exemption from income taxation under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, finding that National Alliance did not qualify as an educational organization. After exhausting its administrative remedies, National Alliance sought judicial review, and the district court held that the test on which the IRS relied to deny the exemption was unconstitutionally vague. Both parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fairchild, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.