National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation v. United States

487 F. Supp. 801 (1979)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation v. United States

United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
487 F. Supp. 801 (1979)

Facts

The National Right to Work Legal Defense and Education Foundation (the foundation) (plaintiff) was organized primarily to defend and protect, free of charge, the rights of workers discriminated against under compulsory unionism arrangements. The foundation was originally incorporated in the District of Columbia and was awarded tax-exempt status under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. In 1975, the foundation’s trustees decided to reincorporate in North Carolina under identical articles of incorporation. The personnel and operations of the foundation also remained unchanged. Because of the reincorporation, however, the foundation had to reapply for exemption under § 501(c)(3), and this time, the commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) denied the exemption. Pursuant to regulations promulgated by the commissioner, one of the exempt purposes for which an exempt entity may be organized is the promotion of social welfare by defending human and civil rights secured by law. The stated reason for the denial was that the phrase human and civil rights was limited to individual liberties and privileges specifically guaranteed by the United States Constitution or special statutory provisions coming directly within the scope of the Thirteenth or Fourteenth Amendments or that otherwise fell within the protection of the Constitution by reason of their long-established recognition at common law. The commissioner argued that the types of grievances the foundation litigated did not necessarily involve such constitutional issues. The foundation filed suit, seeking a refund of taxes paid and a determination that it was entitled to the exemption.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dupree, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership